Though this poster focuses on the funnier side..... check the facts below on the Ishrat Encounter Case
CBI investigation options:
1. Ishrat was an LeT operative and yet the encounter was fake.
2. Ishrat not an LeT operative, but that she was an innocent murdered in a fake encounter.
3. Ishrat was a LeT operative and the encounter was genuine too.
Evidence against Ishrat
1. In 2004, IB recorded various conversations between#Pakistani handlers and their operatives on Indian soil, who were also killed in the same encounter as Ishrat, which clearly pointed out to a conspiracy to kill top Indian politicians including Narendra Modi and LK#Advani. Headlines Today recently ran a story on these tapes.
2. Soon after #Ishrat and her associates were killed in the encounter in 2004, #LeT, on its official website, declared the four of them, including Ishrat, as#martyrs. Later, in an apparent tactical move, LeT retracted this ‘confession’. This now forms one of the basis of defence of Ishrat’s lawyers, who are willing to give credence to LeT’s word but not to our own Intelligence Agencies!
3. In 2006, the Union Home Ministry , then headed by#ShivrajPatil of the #Congress, cleared an affidavit at the level of Home Secretary VK Duggal, that Ishrat and her friends were indeed LeT operatives. The said affidavit was finally filed in Gujarat High Court in August 2009, when Home Ministry was headed by P Chidambaram of Congress and Home secretary was GK Pillai.
4. #NIA in 2010, then under #HomeMinister#Chidambaram of Congress, interrogated David C Headley, another LeT operative involved in 26/11 attacks on Mumbai. In its interrogation report, the NIA quoted #Headley as confirming that Ishrat was indeed an LeT operative.
5) Then Union Home Secretary G K Pillai, is on camera confirming that Ishrat and her associates were LeT operatives.
6. In February 2013, #IntelligenceBureau Chief, Asif Ibrahim wrote a strongly worded letter to CBI where he backed up the IB’s claim that Ishrat was an LeT operative.
CBI investigation options:
1. Ishrat was an LeT operative and yet the encounter was fake.
2. Ishrat not an LeT operative, but that she was an innocent murdered in a fake encounter.
3. Ishrat was a LeT operative and the encounter was genuine too.
Evidence against Ishrat
1. In 2004, IB recorded various conversations between#Pakistani handlers and their operatives on Indian soil, who were also killed in the same encounter as Ishrat, which clearly pointed out to a conspiracy to kill top Indian politicians including Narendra Modi and LK#Advani. Headlines Today recently ran a story on these tapes.
2. Soon after #Ishrat and her associates were killed in the encounter in 2004, #LeT, on its official website, declared the four of them, including Ishrat, as#martyrs. Later, in an apparent tactical move, LeT retracted this ‘confession’. This now forms one of the basis of defence of Ishrat’s lawyers, who are willing to give credence to LeT’s word but not to our own Intelligence Agencies!
3. In 2006, the Union Home Ministry , then headed by#ShivrajPatil of the #Congress, cleared an affidavit at the level of Home Secretary VK Duggal, that Ishrat and her friends were indeed LeT operatives. The said affidavit was finally filed in Gujarat High Court in August 2009, when Home Ministry was headed by P Chidambaram of Congress and Home secretary was GK Pillai.
4. #NIA in 2010, then under #HomeMinister#Chidambaram of Congress, interrogated David C Headley, another LeT operative involved in 26/11 attacks on Mumbai. In its interrogation report, the NIA quoted #Headley as confirming that Ishrat was indeed an LeT operative.
5) Then Union Home Secretary G K Pillai, is on camera confirming that Ishrat and her associates were LeT operatives.
6. In February 2013, #IntelligenceBureau Chief, Asif Ibrahim wrote a strongly worded letter to CBI where he backed up the IB’s claim that Ishrat was an LeT operative.
Comments
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment, as it helps us to improve our articles...!